|
Extract from House of Commons Hansard, 15th January
2002 Westminster Hall Debate
Middle East
Mr. Neil Gerrard (Walthamstow):
My hon. Friend the
Member for Wimbledon (Roger Casale) began the debate by questioning whether
there was a way forward. I agree with the last two speakers. We cannot move
forward as long as the Israeli Government have a political agenda to destabilise
the Palestinian Authority and Yasser Arafat--they have done that by labelling
him as a terrorist and refusing to allow him to visit Bethlehem last Christmas.
In the short term, everyone
wants an end to violence and a willingness to return to talks, but that will not
happen as long as peace moves are accompanied by impossible demands or
artificial timetables--for example, saying that talks will not begin until seven
days without violence have passed, in the knowledge that assassinations will
continue regardless. If we had taken that approach to Northern Ireland and said
that we would not enter into any political discussions as long as there was
violence from whatever source, we would still not have started negotiations or
made political progress.
Something may be gained in
the short term from trying to persuade both sides to accept international
observers in the occupied territories. My hon. Friend the Member for Dundee,
West (Mr. Ross) was right to say that the United Kingdom must be plain about the
possible terms for any long-term settlement. Simply saying that we need to
return to the terms of the Oslo agreement is not the basis for a long-term
agreement. That long-term agreement would have to be on the basis of UN
resolutions and international law, and is not just about an end to settlement
building.
We are still at the stage
of talking about the need to end the expansion of settlements. However, we need
to return to the fundamental fact that every settlement in the West Bank and
Gaza is illegal. There are only two options: either those settlements go or, as
my hon. Friend said, their inhabitants live in a Palestinian state and under the
control of that state rather than that of some occupying army that believes that
it can walk in at any time and do what it likes.
Anyone who has visited the
region, seen the settlements on the hilltops in the West Bank and the water that
is being taken, and has contrasted that with what happens in Gaza and the
conditions there, knows that peace will not happen while those conditions
prevail. There have been suicide bombings, but much of the fighting and many of
the killings over the past few months have occurred around those settlements in
the West Bank and Gaza. They are the focus of the problem.
The other big issue that
must be addressed in the long term is refugees. My hon. Friend and I were
involved in the report to which he referred. People have lived in refugee camps
in Lebanon and Gaza for years and see no prospect of getting out of those
terrible conditions. It is evident that unless something is done to deal with
the problem, there will be no lasting peace. We must recognise the imbalance. It
is no good saying that we will be even handed in a situation that is not even
handed by its nature. Rather than talking simply about what is needed in the
short term to get negotiations going again to achieve a ceasefire--we are doing
too much of that--we must speak plainly about what is needed in the long term
|